Lunotriquetral coalition and ulnar impaction syndrome: a pictorial essay / Coalizão lunato-triquetral e síndrome da impactação ulnar: ensaio iconográfico

Abstract Lunotriquetral coalition and ulnar impaction syndrome are among the spectrum of pathology encountered at the medial wrist. The co-existence of these entities in the same wrist is rare. The purpose of this pictorial essay is to present the etiology, clinical course, imaging findings, and treatment of lunotriquetral coalition and ulnar impaction syndrome, and co-existing disease.

Resumo Coalizão lunatotriquetral e síndrome da impactação ulnar estão incluídas no espectro de doenças do punho medial. A coexistência dessas entidades no mesmo pulso é rara. O objetivo deste ensaio pictórico é apresentar a etiologia, o curso clínico, os achados de imagem e o tratamento da coalizão lunatotriquetral e da síndrome da impactação ulnar, e a coexistência dessas doenças.

Combined ulnar shortening osteotomy and elastic suspended fixation in treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome / 中国修复重建外科杂志

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of ulnar shortening osteotomy combined with elastic suspension fixation for ulnar impaction syndrome caused by relatively long ulna. Methods: Between October 2015 and August 2016, 3 cases of ulnar impaction syndrome were treated. One patient was male and 2 patients were females. The age was 32, 29, and 59 years, respectively. One patient was dislocation and impaction of distal radioulnar joint for more than 1 year after internal fixation due to ulnar and radial open fractures. Other patients had no trauma and surgery, but long-term manual history. The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were 7, 5, and 5, respectively. Cooney wrist function scores were rated as poor. Preoperative X-ray measurements of the ulnar variance was 12.7, 9.0, and 8.7 mm, respectively. The ulna was transversely osteotomy and fixed with plate and screws. The distal radioulnar joint was elastic suspension fixed with mini plate. Results: Postoperative X-ray film showed that the matching of the distal radioulnar joint had no significant difference compared with the contralateral side. All the incisions healed by first intention without complication such as neurovascular injury, infection, and dislocation of the distal radioulnar joint. The patients were followed up 27, 17, and 23 months, respectively. At last follow-up, X-ray film showed that all osteotomy segments achieved bony union without internal fixation failure. The VAS scores were 2, 0, and 1, respectively, and the Cooney wrist function scores were rated as excellent. Conclusion: The ulnar shortening osteotomy combined with elastic suspension fixation can correct the ulna variation, avoid the instability of the distal radioulnar joint caused by the extensive dissection of the tissue around the ulnar, and avoid stiffness of the joints caused by rigid fixation. It is an ideal treatment for ulna impaction syndrome.

Updates on Ulnar Impaction Syndrome / 대한정형외과학회잡지

Ulnar impaction syndrome is one of the common causes of ulnar-sided wrist pain. The pain is usually aggravated by ulnar deviation during a power grip, especially when the forearm is in a pronated position. The most common predisposing factor of ulnar impaction syndrome is ulnar positive variance, which is an increased ulnar length relative to the radius of the radiocarpal joint. However, it can also occur in patients with ulnar neutral or negative variance because ulnar variance can increase during functional activities, including pronation and power gripping. In these patients, the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) may be thickened. If conservative treatments—lifestyle modification, medication, or wrist splinting—are unsuccessful, surgical treatments, such as wafer procedure or ulnar shortening osteotomy can be considered. The wafer procedure is an effective treatment for ulnar impaction syndrome. It removes the distal 2 to 4 mm of the ulnar head, while preserving the ulnar styloid process from fracturing via a limited open or an arthroscopic approach. The advantages of the wafer procedure are that it does not require bone healing or internal fixation and provides direct access to TFCC. However, it is a technically demanding procedure and is contraindicated in patients with distal radio-ulnar joint (DRUJ) instability, lunotriquetral instability, ulnar minus variance, and with an ulnar positive variance of more than 4 mm. Ulnar shortening osteotomy is the most popular method for the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome. It can effectively relieve ulnar impaction symptoms and stabilize DRUJ. However, an excessive amount of shortening may increase the peak pressure at DRUJ, which results in DRUJ arthritis. There is also a possibility of delayed union or nonunion in the osteotomy site. To prevent delayed union or nonunion, we should make an effort to decrease the gap in the osteotomy site during surgery. A serial follow-up is also recommended to evaluate the occurrence of arthritis in DRUJ after ulnar shortening.

Factors Affecting the Occurrence of Distal Radioulnar Joint Arthritis after Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy

PURPOSE: Ulnar shortening osteotmy is a common operation for the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome. The purpose of this study was to evaluate factors that may affect the occurrence of distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) arthritis after ulnar shortening osteotomy. METHODS: From September 2005 to August 2012, we performed 81 ulnar shortening osteotomies for ulnar impaction syndrome, and evaluated occurrence or deterioration of DRUJ arthritis in 58 patients with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. We analyzed potential factors that may affect the occurrence of DRUJ arthritis, such as, age, sex, hand dominance, pre- and postoperative ulnar variance, preexisting DRUJ arthritis, types of radial sigmoid notch, amount of ulnar shortening, and follow up period. RESULTS: DRUJ arthritis occurred or deteriorated in 32 out of the 58 patients. Regression analysis indicated a significant correlation between the type of radial sigmoid notch (type 1) and DRUJ arthritis. Other factors were not found to be correlated with occurrence or deterioration of DRUJ arthritis. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that patients with type 1 radial sigmoid notch (ulnar inclination of more than 10 degrees) are more likely to develop DRUJ arthritis after ulnar shortening osteotomy.

Positive or Negative Ulnar Variance after Ulnar Shortening for Ulnar Impaction Syndrome: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to compare simple radiographic findings and clinical results according to residual ulnar variance following ulnar shortening for ulnar impaction syndrome. METHODS: Forty-five cases of ulnar impaction syndrome, which were treated with ulnar shortening from 2005 to 2008, were studied retrospectively. Group I included 13 cases with positive residual variance after ulnar shortening and group II included 32 cases with negative variance after shortening. The presence of a lunate cystic lesion both preoperatively and at final follow-up and assessments of wrist function based on the modified Mayo wrist score, the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score, as well as the Chun and Palmer score were evaluated. RESULTS: A cystic lesion of the lunate was present in 4 cases preoperatively and the size decreased in 2 cases at final follow-up in group I, and in 10 and 5 cases, respectively, in group II. No statistical difference was observed between the groups. The modified Mayo wrist score, DASH score, as well as the Chun and Palmer score improved significantly in both groups. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of the proportion of positive cystic lesions at final follow-up or the functional scores. CONCLUSIONS: After ulnar shortening, the degree of radiological change in the cystic lunate lesions and clinical improvement did not differ significantly between the groups with unintended residual positive and negative variance after shortening.

Long-term Outcomes of Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy for Idiopathic Ulnar Impaction Syndrome: At Least 5-Years Follow-up

BACKGROUND: There have been few outcomes studies with follow-up after performing ulnar shortening osteotomy for ulnar impaction syndrome. We investigated the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of ulnar shortening osteotomy for the treatment of idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 36 patients who had undergone ulnar shortening osteotomy for idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome for a mean follow-up of 79.1 months (range, 62 to 132 months). The modified Gartland and Werley scores were measured pre- and postoperatively. The radiographic parameters for the assessment of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) as well as the relationship between these radiographic parameters and the clinical and radiological outcomes were determined. RESULTS: The average modified Gartland and Werley wrist score improved from 65.5 +/- 8.1 preoperatively to 93.4 +/- 5.8 at the last follow-up visit. The average preoperative ulnar variance of 4.7 +/- 2.0 mm was reduced to an average of -0.6 +/- 1.4 mm postoperatively. Osteoarthritic changes of the DRUJ were first seen at 34.8 +/- 11.1 months follow-up in 6 of 36 wrists (16.7%). Those who had osteoarthritic changes in the DRUJ had significantly wider preoperative ulnar variance, a longer distal radioulnar distance and a greater length of ulnar shortening, but the wrist scores of the patients who had osteoarthritic changes in the DRUJ were comparable to those who did not have osteoarthritic changes in the DRUJ. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical outcomes are satisfactory for even more than 5 years after ulnar shortening osteotomy for treating idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome despite the osteoarthritic changes of the DRUJ. The patients who need a larger degree of ulnar shortening may develop DRUJ arthritis.

A Comparison of Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy Alone Versus Combined Arthroscopic Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Debridement and Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy for Ulnar Impaction Syndrome

BACKGROUND: This study compared the results of patients treated for ulnar impaction syndrome using an ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) alone with those treated with combined arthroscopic debridement and USO. METHODS: The results of 27 wrists were reviewed retrospectively. They were divided into three groups: group A (USO alone, 10 cases), group B (combined arthroscopic debridement and USO, 9 cases), and group C (arthroscopic triangular fibrocartilage complex [TFCC] debridement alone, 8 cases). The wrist function was evaluated using the modified Mayo wrist score, disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score and Chun and Palmer grading system. RESULTS: The modified Mayo wrist score in groups A, B, and C was 74.5 +/- 8.9, 73.9 +/- 11.6, and 61.3 +/- 10.2, respectively (p 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both USO alone and combined arthroscopic TFCC debridement with USO improved the wrist function and reduced the level of pain in the patients treated for ulnar impaction syndrome. USO alone may be the preferred method of treatment in patients if the torn flap of TFCC is not unstable.

Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy for the Treatment of Ulnar Impaction Syndrome

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes of the ulnar shortening osteotomy alone and the ulnar shortening osteotomy with arthroscopic debridement in the idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome with positive ulnar variance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty seven cases, who underwent the ulnar shortening osteotomy with or without arthroscopic debridement for treatment of the idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome with positive ulnar variance, were included. The mean age was 40.3 years (range, 21 to 63 years) and the mean follow-up period was 20.6 months (range, 12 to 60 months). The ulnar shortening osteotomy alone and the ulnar shortening osteotomy with arthroscopic debridement were performed in 14 and 13 cases respectively. Pre- and postoperative functional results of the wrist were evaluated by the modified Mayo wrist score. RESULTS: The ulnar variance was corrected from 4.61 mm (range, 1.8~10 mm) to -0.06 mm (range, -3.3~3.1 mm) in the ulnar shortening osteotomy alone group and from 3.01 mm (range, 1.2~7.6 mm) to -0.74 mm (range, -1.8~0 mm) in the ulnar shortening osteotomy with arthroscopic debridement group. The final results of the ulnar shortening osteotomy alone were excellent in 4 cases, good in 5 cases, and fair in 5 cases. Those of the ulnar shortening osteotomy with arthroscopic debridement group were excellent in 6 cases, good in 2 cases, fair in 1 case, and poor in 2 cases. The modified Mayo wrist score at the last follow-up were 83.57(range, 75~100) in the ulnar shortening osteotomy alone group and 83.35(range, 40~100) in the ulnar shortening osteotomy with arthroscopic debirdement group. No statistically significant difference was demonstrated between two groups (p=0.43). CONCLUSION: The ulnar shortening osteotomy is valuable treatment for the idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome with positive ulnar variance. The combined arthroscopic debridment does not appear to have positive influence to the final results.

Treatment of Ulnar Impaction Syndrome using Arthroscopy and Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy / 대한정형외과학회잡지

PURPOSE: To retrospectively analyze the follow-up results of patients with ulnar impaction syndrome, who were treated with arthroscopic debridement, thermal shrinkage and a simultaneous ulnar shortening osteotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven wrists from ten patients with ulnar impaction syndrome, which were diagnosed by the clinical history, physical examination, radiological evaluation and arthroscopic findings, and were treated by arthroscopic debridement, thermal shrinkage and ulnar shortening osteotomy were enrolled in this study. The minimum duration of the follow-up was one year. The ulnar variance was measured using Kreder's method, and the follow-up results were analyzed radiographically as well as clinically using the Chun and Palmer wrist score. RESULTS: According to the wrist scoring system, seven wrists were fair and four poor preoperatively. However, after surgery, eight wrists were excellent and three good. The average wrist score increased from 62 preoperatively to 93 at the last follow-up. The mean ulnar variance decreased from +3.3 mm (+0.4-+6.4 mm) preoperatively to +0.1 mm (-0.8-+1.3 mm) at the last follow-up. Radiological union of the osteotomy site was achieved after an average of 12 weeks. There were no cases of nonunion or malunion. CONCLUSION: When ulnar impaction syndrome is diagnosed by the clinical, radiological and arthroscopic findings, arthroscopic debridement, thermal shrinkage and simultaneous ulnar shortening osteotomy are useful treatments for relieving the patients symptoms.

Arthroscopy of the Wrist and Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy for the Treatment of the Ulnar Impaction Syndrome / 대한정형외과학회잡지

PURPOSE: This is a retrospective analysis of patients with ulnar impaction syndrome, who were diagnosed by wrist arthroscopy and treated by simultaneous ulnar shortening osteotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six patients with ulnar impaction syndrome, in whom there was an arthroscopic diagnostic confirmation of the disease had an arthroscopic debridement and ulnar shortening osteotomy. Conservative treatment over a period of more than six months had failed in each patient. The minimum duration of the follow up was one year. The ulnar variance was measured using Kreder's method, and the results were clinically analysed using Chun and Palmer's wrist score as well as radiographically. RESULTS: The Palmer's stages of TFCC injury were 2A (one), 2B (four), 2C (one) on arthroscpic finding. The results were excellent in 4 and good in 2 (preoperative: 3 were fair, and 3 were poor). The wrist score increased from 63 to 94. The ulnar variance changed from +3 mm to -1 mm. CONCLUSION: When an ulnar impaction syndrome is suspected on clinical grounds and by radiographic findings, the pathoanantomy should be assessed arthroscopically. If the arthroscopy reveals Palmer's stages 2A, 2B, 2C, arthroscopic debridement and ulnar shortening osteotomy is a useful method for the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome.